The situation is still unclear. The information is uncertain and doubtful. I confirm informally a resolution implementing the construction of the incinerator to the Holy River .
A side view of the central holy river of Endesa, Photos proposals at Endesa I did not like too much, looking at those photos seem to be a unit small and harmless.
By resolution 21/59 of the regional council in here basically says: [...]: (More ...)
These temperatures are achieved when you burn the containers or piles of waste. The temperature is kept of the incinerators on the 800-900 ° C to minimize the amount of dioxins and furans produced. "
"If you drop below 900 degrees there is a risk that the plastics that contain chlorine or all compounds that contain chlorine, for example by burning scraps of salty foods may produce dioxin. And there are very high percentages of dioxin, which are anyway, because the temperature can not be stable. For example in the fields around the incinerator in Brescia percentage of dioxin were found higher than normal and the same amount of dioxin was found in milk from cows that eat grass grown in these fields. If the temperature is kept very high to avoid the formation of dioxins, the materials that are burned become nanopowders. "
987 degrees in the combustion chamber of the incinerator in Brescia, here's how you do not produce dioxin and produce nanopowders!
Dear Beppe you point out this video on the site of the region, there is little to say, the facts are clear and no one denies or disputes ... http://www.regione.sardegna.it/j/v/25?s=70860
From the photos you can see what affects the area indrustriale orders of magnitude above the town of Porto Torres.
Porto Torres in addition to breathing coal dust permeated dioxin and nano.
They forgot already altatissima incidence of cancer due to the petrochemical and central Endesa.
Not to mention land reclamation: I have friends who have worked for months to drilling and extraction of "petrol" from the ground near the petrochemical ...
They told me to hours of drainage of fluids is not well identified, which are then put into tanker trucks disappear into thin air ... confirming that boasted ideas to construct an underground dam thick 4mt ProFont and 50-90 meters for the Protection of the aquifer that feeds municipal wells!
Who knows what that powerful throws in water discharge that satellite photos show ... And do not forget the chimney of the furnace for coal, is right there next! And we want to omit the puffs of phenol?
The situation is still unclear. The information is uncertain and doubtful. 
